Lincoln Memorial University Law Review Archive
First & Last Page
176-207
Abstract
It is a fact that innocent people have been convicted of crimes they have not committed and sentenced to imprisonment or death. Habeas corpus is a long standing, fundamental right to challenge improper detention. While one intended use of habeas corpus was to seek release from custody due to innocence, federal law has made the process to obtain such relief nearly impossible.This Note explores the history of habeas corpus and its transformation of what it looks like in America today through the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). A specific focus is placed on the pitfalls created by the United States Supreme Court in interpreting the federal legislation. Currently, no real standards exist for an incarcerated person who is actually innocent to obtain habeas relief without strict compliance with AEDPA. This Note proposes a solution to that problem so no other innocent person is put to death for a crime they did not commit.
Recommended Citation
Meganne Lee-Rogers, J.D.,
Federal Habeas Corpus: Actual Innocence or Actual Indifference,
12
Lincoln Mem’l U. L. Rev.
(2025).
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.lmunet.edu/lmulrev/vol12/iss2/7